5

4

5

2.5

5

3

3

4

4

5

2

5

4

4

3 ish

I have occasionally intervened (in a subtle way) in something involving two other people, both strangers.

Fear of confrontation and retaliation/crazy reactions, for sure

Being a foreigner who only lived in the US for only 7 years, I am not sure I can read the situation appropriately

I have been targeted by strangers in the past based on my ethnicity, race, accent, etc. I am just worried that intervening might make me a target again.

"I have occasionally intervened (in a subtle way) in something involving two other people, both strangers.": added note: the case I was thinking of was egregious and ongoing.

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

4

2

3

3

4

5

5

5

For the same reason, I would feel more confident in being able to read the situation if it is people I know

6

4

2

5

4

3

3

3

5

1

3

4

3

4

2-3 — this has potential $ implications

I am a white, male, 6’4”, 240 lbs …. bring it

love this ^

All of this depends far too much on context to be given a number.

That was uncomfortable.

Tokenism

Extra burden expected of underrepresented faculty

yes

Unpaid labor

Could I imagine it? Not in anything I am likely to see.

Not only can I imagine it, I’ve seen it all too many times at UO, unfortunately

Also one no should be enough.

If Kaushal is a junior faculty member—this would be really important for a senior colleague to help point out the burden we are imposing

Yes, Rich!!!

And underscore the importance of this work for ALL colleagues.

So, just say stop when you want to try something

Maybe missed the opportunity to think about how everyone should contribute—-what Jay just said

Kaushal, I had that thought :(

Thank you for the last two comments! Yes, always a risk of trying to be the savior!

Data-based decision making!!!!

No discussion of the criteria they are using to evaluate the candidates

The scene seemed to focus on "fit."

^ Rachael

Always allowed to say that

Also Benjamin and the other person teaming up to reject—makes it harder for Gerard to interject

@Jay - thank you for that.

You're right.

Hehe! Awesome Jay!

Unfortunately, I have to leave. I have class at 4. Thank you for the exercise. I found it helpful.

best practice is to start a candidate de-brief with strengths...and then move to areas for development

It would be ideal to have a Search Advocate work with the committee as well, to help address bias and create consistent and equitable processes for reviewing and discussing candidates.

The meeting was badly organized to begin with. It should have been planned to discuss every candidate, in some order. We don't start a hiring meeting about multiple candidates with "What do you all think?" I have never seen one that started that way, in 30 years.

Good point by N. Phillips

I would answer to Benjamin that we have to go back to the criteria and discuss along those as a way to reduce implicit bias

Nick and Rich, sadly, I have seen them start this way.

Just want to chime in with my evergreen complaint that the student voice on most search committees (if there even is a student voice) is almost always an undergraduate. Would be nice if search committees also included a graduate student voice, too.

Great point, Ed

Referring to peer-reviewed research (;-)) that shows how important it is for students from underrepresented groups to be able to identify with voices that represent them?

https://oregon.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_aYtprfMXaIoUTJQ

My apologies if my comments were too rough. That was not my intention. Thanks, Anthony

The importance of making sure that we do pause/interrupt—-even if we are not sure what to say

Thanks for providing the opportunity to demonstrate and practice these difficult conversations.

Excellent job, everyone. Always learn something new at RFL

@Jay In my opinion your comments and contributions were excellent. Your point was excellent. It's just sooo hard to have these discussions.

Love that Dan!

@Jay - I am glad for your comment. I'm always learning.

Thank you!

Thank you!

Os that open to staff as well, Janet?

Environmental design motion vote below

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

YES

Yes

yes

yes

yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes on design

yes

yes

yes

yes

Ys

yes

Yes

YES

Yes

Yes

Yes

yes

yes

Yes

yes

Yes!

Yes (filling in for Sara Mason)

yes

yes

Yes, 100%

yes

yes

Yes on BA/BS in ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN.

Thank you very much everyone

Thank you, all, very much.

@Jay, yes. The leadership academy is open to staff.

Yes

Vote for motion below

Yes

Yes

Yes

yes

Yes

yes

yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

Yes

Yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

Yes

Yes

yes

Yes

YEs

yes

yes

yes

Yes

yes

yes

yes

Yes on changes to STUDY ABROAD PROGRAMS COMMITTEE.

Thanks everyone!

yes

Excellent points Ryan.

https://inclusion.uoregon.edu/ideal-climate-survey-results-2022

Thanks all

Thank you so very much, Yvette

thank you!